Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 22:10

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Diddy Trial's Most Disturbing Claims: Week Six Breakdown - TooFab
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
This decades-old Gmail trick is still my favorite email management hack - Android Police
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Here’s why exercise is so important if you’re a cancer survivor - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Can I fix a fridge leak myself, or should I call a pro?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
"Gasping": Scientists Make Breakthrough Toward Full Cure for HIV - futurism.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.